Side by side
Compare
Two views. First, display physics: E Ink against OLED, LCD, Mini-LED, memory LCD, and reflective cousins. Second, up to three devices from the catalog, side by side.
Display technologies
| Tech | Sun | Motion | Color | Power | Paper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E Ink (Carta) Electrophoretic | 10 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 |
E Ink Kaleido 3 Electrophoretic + CFA | 8 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 8 |
E Ink Gallery 3 ACeP electrophoretic | 8 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 8 |
OLED Emissive | 4 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 1 |
IPS LCD Transmissive | 5 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 2 |
Mini-LED Transmissive | 6 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 2 |
Memory LCD (MIP) Reflective LCD | 9 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 |
Reflective LCD Reflective LCD | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
Scores are editorial 1–10, not lab measurements. Radar: Carta (ink), OLED (pine), IPS LCD (outline).
- E Ink (Carta). Bistable pigment. Best paper analog. Holds an image with no power.
- E Ink Kaleido 3. Filter color. Grain and a darker page in exchange for comics and covers.
- E Ink Gallery 3. Pigment color. Slow, rich, for notebooks rather than browsers.
- OLED. Perfect blacks indoors. Washes out in sun. Always emitting light at your face.
- IPS LCD. The default laptop panel. Backlight, glare, decent color, thirsty.
- Mini-LED. Local dimming for HDR. Still a lamp. Still not paper.
- Memory LCD (MIP). Pebble’s cousins and Withings’ face. Not E Ink. Very efficient, less paper-like.
- Reflective LCD. Daylight Computer, TCL NXTPAPER. Color and motion with a paper-ish surface. Not bistable pigment.
Device vs device
Hisense Hisense A10 | |
|---|---|
| Score | 8.3 |
| Price | $590 |
| Category | phones |
| Panel | carta-1300 |
| Color | B&W |
| Size | 6.13" |
| PPI | 300 |
| OS | Android |
| Weight | 210 g |
| Front light | Yes |
| Stylus | No |
| Cellular | Yes |
| Waterproof | No |
| Best for | E-ink daily driver with an escape hatch |